Clementine Workshop Notes
--------------------------
Operations:
	Task grouping: started with all the tasks and grouped them
		(meta chart concept)
	Categorized them into 9-5, 24 hrs, time scales
	Minimize people needed (& around the clock)
	Define schedule clearly -> avoids overstressing ops personnel
	Rehearsals to test s/w, h/w and ops sequences
	Staff = 32(full), 30(support), 15(part time), 24(as needed)
		These included programmers, managers, admin, tests,
		But does not include the science team
	Did not really have a hit by the truck scenario
	Jobs: (8 people)
		Trajectory analysis, science planning - overtasked,
		scheduler - mainly external, ops controller, 
		spacecraft engineer - monitered the craft state+ cmd,
		software engineer - testbed ops & overtasked,
		data manager - verify data integrity & quality?,
		sensor specialist.
	Commands were always tested on the testbed before sending out
		and verfied by the commanders. There were instances of
		the testbed not catching the problem (~1/week)
	* Ability to change h/w on the fly - add, update (2 yrs)
	S/W assistance everywhere - User Interfaces critical here

Science Mission: Trevor
	Philosophy: minimize distance between science team & spacecraft
	mission team: eliminated paperwork & layers ->Single point contact
	Prioritization of tasks helped a lot
	In flight calibration
	Relied on software engg. to test pointing quaternions - some
	problems got through - no simulator ?
	
	


Contacts (names, phone,e-mail,fax, speciality, contribution)
------------------------------------------------------------


Trip Summary
-------------

Be is a stiff structural material, in addition to having high 
  heat capacity

Gyro is the way to go (6 kg, 10 W, mRad accy), not a tech difficulty
   & enough time to work the environmental problem. Dick Miligue is
   the way to go...

Dedicated Ground station is a must (we can configure as needed and
  run tests)

Laser comm system possible (Mimic program at Arpa)

Solar Array Brittleness was not a problem (what kind, what eff, mounts?)

Careful with acoustic noise effect of a Proton on Honeycombs,
  what matters mass/unit area and distance bet reinforcements

Be very careful with the Russian space machinery - telemetry specs
   of a proton need higher margins, any facilities we would need 
   have to be verfied to be operational and funded for 2-3 years

Very possible to do an recalibrable striping sensor system for 
    < 400k, need reworking to the problem)