Newsgroups: sci.lang
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!gatech!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!alderson
From: alderson@netcom.com (Richard M. Alderson III)
Subject: Re: Roots of Lithuanian language ?
In-Reply-To: chesswks@also.hooked.net's message of 25 May 1995 23:34:59 -0700
Message-ID: <aldersonD974Fs.457@netcom.com>
Reply-To: alderson@netcom.com
Fcc: /u9/alderson/postings
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
References: <3q3sqj$sj@also.hooked.net>
Date: Fri, 26 May 1995 17:26:16 GMT
Lines: 13
Sender: alderson@netcom16.netcom.com

In article <3q3sqj$sj@also.hooked.net> chesswks@also.hooked.net (Eric Schiller)
writes:

>But what does Eric Hamp think? 

About what, Eric?  There has been a fair amount posted in this thread (most of
which I've ignored...).  Do you mean, "What does EH think about Balto-Slavic as
a sub-grouping?"  Last I knew, he accepted it...
-- 
Rich Alderson   You know the sort of thing that you can find in any dictionary
                of a strange language, and which so excites the amateur philo-
                logists, itching to derive one tongue from another that they
                know better: a word that is nearly the same in form and meaning
                as the corresponding word in English, or Latin, or Hebrew, or
                what not.
                                                --J. R. R. Tolkien,
alderson@netcom.com                               _The Notion Club Papers_
