Newsgroups: sci.image.processing
From: Steve@dstrip.demon.co.uk (Steve Rencontre)
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!news.alpha.net!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!peernews.demon.co.uk!dstrip.demon.co.uk!Steve
Subject: Re: [help!] Signal to noise ratio?
References: <grunes.134.793465265@news.nrl.navy.mil> <3hr86c$mak@net.auckland.ac.nz> <3iehaq$f11@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
Distribution: world
Organization: Datastrip Limited
Reply-To: Steve@dstrip.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Newswin Alpha 0.6
Lines:  18
X-Posting-Host: dstrip.demon.co.uk
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 1995 12:34:32 +0000
Message-ID: <671504652wnr@dstrip.demon.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk

In article: <grunes.134.793465265@news.nrl.navy.mil>  grunes@news.nrl.navy.mil (Mitchell R Grunes) 
writes:

> I really can't image what PMSE (peak mean square error) could possibly
> mean.  I think it must be an error.

It would make sense if it were the peak value of the MSE's from several
datasets related in some way. (Eg, successive frames from a camera, 
subregions of an image, etc.)

Just guessing, though.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Rencontre               |  steve@dstrip.demon.co.uk (business) 
If it works, it's obsolete.   |  steveren@cix.compulink.co.uk (private)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

