From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!torn!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!asuacad!kvjlc Wed Sep 16 21:23:18 EDT 1992
Article 6903 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!torn!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!asuacad!kvjlc
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Monday, 14 Sep 1992 10:02:24 MST
>From: Jon L. Campbell <KVJLC@ASUACAD.BITNET>
Message-ID: <92258.100224KVJLC@ASUACAD.BITNET>
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject:    What's a turing verb got to do with anything???
Lines: 15


Well, I must say that the attention level of intelligent debate in this
group is much less than I would have thought.  When someone posts something
that lacks 'sex' or 'abstract' verbage, the group seems to lose interest.
But, I must admit, with all the stimulating discussions going on about
verbs and turing, it is no wonder that when it comes down to discussing
physical or logical gated technology most people wait for the steamy
side to respond.

I hate to say this, but from what I've seen posted in this net, I think
that there is few loose synaps trying to articulate AI from the same
stage as someone discussing religion.

Flame off:  -----  Thought, abstract and yet concrete, it is the basis
                   for all mistakes man has ever made.


