From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!hri.com!noc.near.net!garbo.ucc.umass.edu!dime!chelm.cs.umass.edu!yodaiken Sun Dec  1 13:05:26 EST 1991
Article 1629 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Xref: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca sci.philosophy.tech:1146 comp.ai.philosophy:1629
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!hri.com!noc.near.net!garbo.ucc.umass.edu!dime!chelm.cs.umass.edu!yodaiken
>From: yodaiken@chelm.cs.umass.edu (victor yodaiken)
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech,comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Searle (was Re: Daniel Dennett (was Re: Comme
Message-ID: <39819@dime.cs.umass.edu>
Date: 26 Nov 91 16:12:21 GMT
Article-I.D.: dime.39819
References: <MATT.91Nov24000158@physics.berkeley.edu> <1991Nov24.195230.5843@husc3.harvard.edu> <1991Nov26.011950.1658@hilbert.cyprs.rain.com>
Sender: news@dime.cs.umass.edu
Followup-To: sci.philosophy.tech
Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Lines: 20

In article <1991Nov26.011950.1658@hilbert.cyprs.rain.com> max@hilbert.cyprs.rain.com (Max Webb) writes:
>In article <1991Nov24.195230.5843@husc3.harvard.edu> zeleny@zariski.harvard.edu (Mikhail Zeleny) writes:
>>In article <MATT.91Nov24000158@physics.berkeley.edu> 
>>matt@physics.berkeley.edu (Matt Austern) writes:
>>A symbol is an iconic or a substitutive sign, something that stands for
>>something else.  A C function is a symbol standing for an assembly language
>>algorithm, and, eventually, for a sequence of machine language instructions,
>>in virtue of your system's compilers.  Pray tell, what part of the computer
>>hardware or software could make it stand for something outside the machine,
>>as signs used by humans stand for things in virtue of their meanings?
>
>1) a C function does NOT denote machine language instructions. Otherwise
>   the concept of multiply-targeted C compilers would have no meaning.
>   You are discussing the semantics of programming languages, which you
>   (apparently) have never studied. How *ignorant* of you (to paraphrase
>   your insult of another poster).
>

And what, then, do compilers do? Translate C programs into objects which
they do not denote?


