From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwm.edu!wupost!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!nuscc!hilbert!smoliar Tue Nov 26 12:32:41 EST 1991
Article 1612 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwm.edu!wupost!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!nuscc!hilbert!smoliar
>From: smoliar@hilbert.iss.nus.sg (stephen smoliar)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Is dialectical thought an "informal logic"?
Message-ID: <1991Nov25.131801.28709@nuscc.nus.sg>
Date: 25 Nov 91 13:18:01 GMT
References: <rreiner.690959273@yorku.ca> <s90wBB2w164w@depsych.Gwinnett.COM>
Sender: usenet@nuscc.nus.sg
Organization: Institute of Systems Science, NUS, Singapore
Lines: 18

In article <s90wBB2w164w@depsych.Gwinnett.COM> rc@depsych.Gwinnett.COM (Richard
Carlson) writes:
>
>So the kind of AI I'm interested in is an explicit discourse and
>narrative analysis which will allow me to precisely characterize
>the narrative structures and trajectories of these narratives and
>the ways in which they might be deconstructed.  That's the hard AI
>technology I'm looking for and why I started posting in this
>Newsgroup in the first place.

With all due respect, why THIS Newsgroup?  sci.lang and comp.ai.nlang-know-rep
seem a bit more suited to your needs.  If you are trying to wrestle with some
genuine practical problems, why are you hanging around the philosophers?
-- 
Stephen W. Smoliar; Institute of Systems Science
National University of Singapore; Heng Mui Keng Terrace
Kent Ridge, SINGAPORE 0511
Internet:  smoliar@iss.nus.sg


