From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!generic.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!wupost!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!ugle.unit.no!nuug!ulrik!rolfl Tue Nov 19 11:08:52 EST 1991
Article 1180 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!generic.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!wupost!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!ugle.unit.no!nuug!ulrik!rolfl
>From: rolfl@hedda.uio.no (Rolf Lindgren)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Chinese Room Experiment
Message-ID: <ROLFL.91Nov1082212@hedda.uio.no>
Date: 1 Nov 91 07:22:12 GMT
References: <1991Oct31.101237.35146@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> <1991Oct31.112951.1985@arizona.edu>
Sender: news@ulrik.uio.no (Mr News)
Distribution: world,local
Organization: Institutt for Humanistisk Informatikk, Blindern, Oslo, Norway
Lines: 18
In-Reply-To: bill@NSMA.AriZonA.EdU's message of 31 Oct 91 18:29:50 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host: hedda.uio.no


   mcginnis@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:
   >I'm looking for a good explanation/discussion of the Chinese Room 
   >Experiment... preferrably one by Searle himself.  I think I saw an
   >article in Scientific American about this once, but I have looked 
   >through a few years worth of Sci. Am. and haven't located it.
   >

A few months ago, John Searle and John Haugeland discussed this in
Scientific American (Jan. 1990, I think).

The original article is from about 1980, in "Journal of behavioral and
brain sciences" .

--
Rolf Lindgren		| 	"The opinions expressed above are 
616 Bjerke Studentheim	|  	 not necessarily those of anyone"	
N-0589 OSLO 5		|             rolfl@hedda.uio.no 


