Newsgroups: or.politics,pdx.general,alt.culture.oregon,talk.politics.theory,alt.politics.economics,can.politics,sci.econ,talk.politics.libertarian,misc.invest.stocks,alt.society.labor-unions,ab.politics,alt.politics.libertarian,bc.politics,alt.politics.radical-left,comp.ai.alife,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.socialism,alt.politics.usa.republican
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!goldenapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news.dfci.harvard.edu!camelot.ccs.neu.edu!nntprelay.mathworks.com!howland.erols.net!infeed2.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!NEWS!not-for-mail
From: George Patterson <gpatter340@linknet.net>
Subject: Re: CONSTITUTIONALISTS UNDERSTAND MCVEIGH IS A NUT!!!
Message-ID: <33D9115B.611B@linknet.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 15:49:31 -0500
References: <33b6c11c.6528055@News.HTWM.De> <33b864cc.7790206@news.cinternet.net> <33ba9e56.16727871@News.HTWM.De> <33bc652c.24178938@news.cinternet.net> <33c018a5.12047623@news.pernet.com> <33c6dd7b.372492@news.cuug.ab.ca> <33c7deb0.681632@news.cuug.ab.c <EDr98K.9A2@iglou.com> <citizenz-2407971353440001@news.sfo.com> <5r8qd6$k49$1@glisan.hevanet.com>
Reply-To: gpatter340@linknet.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 36
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu sci.econ:73598 comp.ai.alife:8306

Guerilla wrote:
> 
> In article <citizenz-2407971353440001@news.sfo.com>,
>    citizenz@mailcity.com (Citizen Z) wrote:
> |In article <EDr98K.9A2@iglou.com>, bathroom@iglou2.iglou.com (Tim Brown)
> wrote:
> |
> |> Kentucky has no ranches.  I know this, because I am from Kentucky.
> 
> Ya, I made it all up.
> 
> |>    If this story refers to a raid against a marijuana patch, then I'm
> |> really confused, because McVeigh's allies are the same people who support
> 
> Yes, you are really confused.  As you, nor I, nor anyone else understands more
> than a few paragraphs of his philosophy.  Thats all he has written.  And if
> you understand English, the title I selected makes no statement about his
> thoughts.  Hope this clears up your confusion.
> 
> Are you free?
> 
> Do you own your body?  Can you prostitute yourself, sell your organs, or
> medicate yourself?  Do you own your labor?  Can you work for any wage
> you want, whatever hours you want, and keep the fruits of your sweat?
> 
> Do you own your possessions?  Can the terms of your property ownership
> be changed at any time, or for any reason?  Can your property be taxed
> without limitation?
> 
> Can you travel freely?  Must you carry identification papers for you and your
> property, submit to search without warrant, cause, or recourse?
> 
> There is a spectrum upon which lie two endpoints.  One point is slavery, and
> at the other end:  FREEDOM.
And FREEDOM, i.e., total freedom is anarchy--no civilization, no
society, just everyone for himself--gp

