Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in3.uu.net!news2.new-york.net!not-for-mail
From: vlad@world2u.com (Vlastimil Adamovsky)
Subject: Re: [SE] another bug?
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
X-Nntp-Posting-User: (Unauthenticated)
Message-ID: <DyB97p.DL5@news2.new-york.net>
References: <32499AA8.6C0A@csu.edu.au> <3248C667.602F@objectshare.com> <Meitnik-2509960436190001@ttye0.emi.net> <32493C9C.4C1C@objectshare.com>
X-Trace: 843692378/17587
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: i123.170.world2u.com
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 22:59:22 GMT
Lines: 28

Eric Clayberg <eclayberg@objectshare.com> wrote:

>Andrew s. Meit wrote:
>> From someone who does QA as his profession... it would be of great help to
>> newbies to post all the known bugs so we dont get bug bitten and decide
>> its just too buggy.

>Depending on your definition of "known", this has already been done.
>There is a bug fix file that can be downloaded from the Smalltalk
>Express web page. It contains fixes for three reported problems that
>were in the initial release. As new problems are reported (and fixed),
>that file will surely grow. My assumption is that Digitalk maintained
>such a list for their old V/Win16 product. If we can get our hands on
>it, we will post it to the web site as well.

Considering, that Smalltalk V/Win16 is about 5-6 years old, it is
surprising to  find  some of those bugs after so many years.
People used Smalltalk V/Win 16, didn't they? 
 During my work I found many bugs (in Smalltalk V/Win16) and I had to
fix them. The nice result was, that programs written by me didn't work
in the "correct" version.



 
 Vlastimil Adamovsky
 ** C++ and Smalltalk consultant**

