Newsgroups: comp.ai.games
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!cornellcs!newsfeed.cit.cornell.edu!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!news.kei.com!news.mathworks.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!oleane!in2p3.fr!swidir.switch.ch!scsing.switch.ch!news.dfn.de!news.uni-augsburg.de!news
From: Pit <schaefer@malaga.math.uni-augsburg.de>
Subject: Re: Really cool 
Message-ID: <DH9rwA.G5u@Yuri.CC.Uni-Augsburg.DE>
Sender: news@Yuri.CC.Uni-Augsburg.DE (The News Administrator)
Nntp-Posting-Host: jaen.math.uni-augsburg.de
Organization: Computer Center, University of Augsburg, Germany
References: <46iqce$fhe@news.bu.edu> <bfb_9510270100@rtbbs.iaf.nl>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 16:16:57 GMT
Lines: 21

melle@rtbbs.iaf.nl (Melle Koning) wrote:
>
> Hello meissner@park.bu.edu!
> 
> Tuesday October 24 1995 14:40, meissner@park.bu.edu wrote:
> 
>  :  >> Here's a serious poser for one and all. If the representaion of
>  :  >> knowledge in an individual is not consistent, that is we may deal with
>  :  >> one type of problem domain with one type of represntational schema and
>  :  >> another with a completelydiffernt paradigmn (or with a hybrid). How
>  :  >> would you in the environment of say a tactical wargame represent this
>  :  >> multi-representational model?
> 
>  > : Could you rephrase your question please?
> 
>  > I think your question has a poor representation. :)
> 
> Is this a joke?
> 
Answer: by using a third paradigm that does operate on the abstracts
that the other representations give.
