Newsgroups: sci.lang
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!oitnews.harvard.edu!purdue!haven.umd.edu!hecate.umd.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!199.166.239.112!byron.net4.io.org!acli
From: acli@byron.net4.io.org (Ambrose Li)
Subject: Re: Pinyin
Keywords: Chinese Romanization zhuhinfuhao keyboards bo-po-mo-fo Taiwan
Message-ID: <E3K477.8xL@byron.net4.io.org>
Organization: somewhere in Scarborough, Canada running C News CR.E and some assorted hacks for NNTP (including a hacked nntpxmit derived from NNTP 1.5.12)
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 1997 22:37:55 GMT
References: <5ai7t6$aq3@reader.seed.net.tw>
Lines: 12

On 3 Jan 1997 06:10:46 GMT, in article <5ai7t6$aq3@reader.seed.net.tw>,  <dski@cameonet.cameo.com.tw> wrote:
>Romanization-based input systems were slow in coming out here, and the
>only one I've seen is not very good: it ignores tones, and it uses some
>weird spellings unrelated to any widely-used Romanization system. This is

Perhaps for Cantonese-based romanization input systems. All of the
Mandarin-based romanization input systems I have seen do not ignore
tones.

-- 
Ambrose Li ~ @io.org:acli@byron.net4.io.org   (Hello, world !\n)
~ http://www.io.org/~acli/acli-index.html ~    print flush quit
