Newsgroups: sci.lang,soc.culture.esperanto
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!cornellcs!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!portc01.blue.aol.com!chi-news.cic.net!News1.mcs.net!news.abs.net!news.bconnex.net!news.supernet.net!news-out.microserve.net!news-in.microserve.net!netaxs.com!hunter.premier.net!news.thenet.net!uunet!in3.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!howland.erols.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!commpost!usenet
From: pardoej@lonnds.ml.com (Julian Pardoe LADS LDN X1428)
Subject: Re: Defining English \ Difini la anglan
Message-ID: <Dvru5C.9xH@tigadmin.ml.com>
Sender: usenet@tigadmin.ml.com (News Account)
Reply-To: pardoej@lonnds.ml.com
Organization: Merrill Lynch Europe
References: <DvL3Mz.23s@scn.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 14:12:48 GMT
Lines: 15

In article <DvL3Mz.23s@scn.org>, lilandbr@scn.org (Leland Bryant Ross) writes:
-->
-->ENGLISH ABSTRACT 
-->How do proponents of English
-->as the official language of      
-->the United States propose to     
-->*define* the English lang-       
-->uage so as to *determine*        
-->whether a given utterance or     
-->text is or is not English?

I always wondered the same about French in Quebec.

-- jP --

