Newsgroups: comp.multimedia,comp.dsp,comp.speech
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!news.ucdavis.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!hasty
From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr)
Subject: Re: Speech coding on Internet
Message-ID: <hastyD2rsAC.9uI@netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
References: <macker-060195121523@whitefang.itd.nrl.navy.mil> <3ek8tr$631@gwdu19.gwdg.de> <3eufp4$nid@metlab3.my>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 1995 19:18:12 GMT
Lines: 26
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.multimedia:28538 comp.dsp:16046 comp.speech:4413

In article <3eufp4$nid@metlab3.my> pecampbe@mtu.edu (Paul E. Campbell) writes:
>Ralf Koester (rkoeste@gwdu19.gwdg.de) wrote:
>: Just a (stupid?) question:
>: Is the "data highway" already prepared for all the upcoming
>
>A major advantage of handling speech as a half-duplex process is that you 
>don't need a DSP or other hardware to do things. Slower machines will cause
>the resulting delay between transmission and receipt to get larger because
>the time needed to encode/decode gets worse.
>
>With this design in mind, there are no limits to "internet voice" except
>that the time delay can become unacceptable at some point, it will always
>work, just that it will be better or worse depending on the environment.


Have you heard of IP Mulitcasting and Van Jacbson's experiment on the
internet broadcasting voice and video on the Net ?

 Amancio


-- 
FREE unix, gcc, tcp/ip, X, open-look, netaudio,  tcl/tk, MIME, 
midi,sound at  freebsd.cdrom.com:/pub/FreeBSD
	Amancio Hasty,  Consultant 
	Home: (415) 495-3046       
	e-mail hasty@netcom.com	   
