Newsgroups: comp.edu,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.modula2,comp.lang.scheme
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!udel!news.mathworks.com!satisfied.apocalypse.org!news2.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!adaworks
From: adaworks@netcom.com (AdaWorks)
Subject: Re: Comparison of languages for CS1 and CS2
Message-ID: <adaworksDCAowz.B5v@netcom.com>
Followup-To: comp.edu,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.modula2,comp.lang.scheme
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <DBEwuo.8L@world.std.com> <fjm.104.000FF1E0@ti.com> <DBzEC8.9LH@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <3v0a6k$d4d@reuters2.mitre.org> <3v38fm$9p4@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 23:22:10 GMT
Lines: 15
Sender: adaworks@netcom2.netcom.com
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.edu:13550 comp.lang.ada:33193 comp.lang.c++:140657 comp.lang.modula2:12211 comp.lang.scheme:13353

Michael Feldman (mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu) wrote:

: Roughly the same process was followed for Ada 95, except that there was
: no competition for a language design; a _team_ led by Tucker Taft of
: Intermetrics developed the revision.
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^

  I mentioned this one day to Tony Wasserman. He responded with, "Oh, so
  the Red language finally won after all."  :-)

  Richard Riehle
  adaworks@netcom.com

-- 
                                             adaworks@netcom.com
