Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!cam-news-feed3.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news.stealth.net!uunet!in3.uu.net!165.254.2.53!nonexistent.com!not-for-mail
From: Timothy Reaves <reaves@unix.asb.com>
Subject: [VA] Should classes be SmallTalk or non-visual parts?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Nntp-Posting-User: (Unauthenticated)
Reply-To: reaves@unix.asb.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <E6JMnt.KLr@nonexistent.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02E (OS/2; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: 857519991/25830
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: sls27.asb.com
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 23:59:44 GMT
Lines: 7

When codeing logic classes (domain objects), should I just use a
class browser, or should I make them non-visual parts? It seems that
going the nvp route opens up added flexability, but what am I
missing?    I'll also be using a Versant database, and am not sure how
the VisualAge scripts will change what I need to do.

     Any help appreciated!
