Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!rfenney.slip.netcom.com!user
From: rfenney@netcom.com (Robert J. Fenney)
Subject: Re: Opinions about ST/V Mac?
Message-ID: <rfenney-150395210811@rfenney.slip.netcom.com>
Followup-To: comp.lang.smalltalk
Sender: netnews@mork.netcom.com
Organization: FenTek
References: <3jqdrf$td3@kira.cc.uakron.edu>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 1995 05:07:48 GMT
Lines: 30

In article <3jqdrf$td3@kira.cc.uakron.edu>, x1gsd@dax.cc.uakron.edu
(Gregory S Delozier) wrote:

> As a reasonable satisfied user of ST/V Windows, I'm interested in
> opinions about the ST/V Mac product. Specifically, I have to create
> prototypes of mathematical and communications applications. (Math is
> less important that being able to talk to the serial port and get at a
> reasonable GUI capability...
> 
> So, is ST/V Mac capable of being used to create small-to-medium 
> applications? I've heard some complaints about it, but everything has
> some problems. What I'd like to know if ST/V is generally usable,
> at least. Does it work OK under Power/PC 68K emulation? Is there some
> better product I should know about?
> 
> 
> Thanks for any comments you might have....
> 
> -greg
> ---
> Greg DeLozier

Unfortunately ST/V MAC is DEAD! I wish Digitalk would reconsided but untel
they do look at SmalltalkAgents. And yes it looks like the next version
will be one of the BEST Macintosh development environment for large
projects. I only wish they would provide a team version aka ENVI's tools!
(I think I will call them tomarrow!!!!!!)


Robert
