Newsgroups: comp.lang.dylan
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk!warwick!uknet!festival!edcogsci!richard
From: richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin)
Subject: Re: IO again
Message-ID: <CvtEGH.J7G@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh
References: <34ebld$pp4@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> <778864222snz@wildcard.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 1994 14:19:29 GMT
Lines: 14

In article <778864222snz@wildcard.demon.co.uk> cyber_surfer@wildcard.demon.co.uk writes:
>It occured to me recently what a fine machine the Rekursiv would
>have been for running Dylan.

The Rekursiv wasn't even a fine machine for running Lingo - someone
did a port to a Sun 3 that ran faster!  Why should it be any use for
Dylan?

-- Richard
-- 
Richard Tobin, HCRC, Edinburgh University                 R.Tobin@ed.ac.uk

Ooooh!  I didn't know we had a king.  I thought we were an
autonomous collective.
