Sixteenth Annual Conference of the COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY August 13-16, 1994 Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia CALL FOR REVIEWERS To help carry out the peer review process for the Cognitive Science conference, we are seeking reviewers who are expert in one or more of the multiple areas that are represented at the conference. If you are interested in being considered as a reviewer for the conference, or know of someone else who should be, please fill out one of these forms and submit it as soon as possible. Prime qualifications are a willingness to provide thoughtful, informed comments on submissions. Reviewers will evaluate submitted papers with respect to several criteria, including originality, quality, and significance of research, relevance to a broad audience of cognitive science researchers, and clarity of presentation. The peer review process serves four important functions: it ensures that the best papers are selected for presentation at the conference; it provides valuable feedback to the authors of all submitted papers, whether accepted or declined; it helps define the state-of-the-art of our field by identifying the papers that best represent it; and it helps shape the future of our field by identifying research that best elucidates the future. Nominations for reviewers should be sent on this form or by electronic mail to: Prof. Ashwin Ram Cognitive Science 1994 Conference Georgia Institute of Technology College of Computing 801 Atlantic Drive Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0280 cogsci94@cc.gatech.edu Self-nominations are welcome. Please use one form per nomination. CONFERENCE CHAIRS Kurt Eiselt and Ashwin Ram STEERING COMMITTEE Dorrit Billman, Mike Byrne, Alex Kirlik, Janet Kolodner (chair), Nancy Nersessian, Mimi Recker, and Tony Simon Sixteenth Annual Conference of the COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY August 13-16, 1994 Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia REVIEWER NOMINATION FORM Name: Position: Affiliation: Mailing address: E-mail address: Phone number: Fax number: Areas of speciality: Discipline: Problems addressed in nominee's research: Methodologies employed in nominee's research: Upto five most relevant publications: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.