Newsgroups: comp.speech
Path: pavo.csi.cam.ac.uk!pipex!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!agate!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!nat
From: nat@netcom.com (Nathaniel Stitt)
Subject: Re: Voice Stress Analysis
Message-ID: <1992Oct6.154830.6678@netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
References: <9227613.17164@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <1992Oct6.001453.14982@eng.ufl.edu>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 15:48:30 GMT
Lines: 19

In article <1992Oct6.001453.14982@eng.ufl.edu> george@beta.ee.ufl.edu (George L) writes:
>In article <9227613.17164@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> mkwan@cs.mu.OZ.AU (Matthew Kwan) writes:
>>I suppose this is the right newsgroup ...
>>
>>Here and there I've come across vague references to a technique
>>known as voice stress analysis, which allegedly works as a form
...
>
>Actually, this is an extremely timely subject. With the upcoming elections, 
>we will have a wealth of valid data (complete with video as well). If some-
>one finds a decent approach, we can all calibrate our equipment direct 
>from the lips of our politicians.
>

But do you use this data to calibrate your insterment for the detection
of TRUTH, or of DECEPTION?

N

