Message-ID: <32B8CD30.2EFD@usa.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 23:05:52 -0600
From: Christopher ZERVIC <zervic@usa.net>
Organization: La Knabujo
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 [es] (Macintosh; I; 68K)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.uu.lang.misc,sci.lang,alt.language.artificial
Subject: Re: Naturalismo e schematicismo, no problema in linguas auxiliar
References: <57p39d$qa1@oden.abc.se> <58flei$mk3@nntp1.best.com> <58pp7f$spv@oden.abc.se> <32B765AE.4A2F@usa.net> <850924539snz@vision25.demon.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: max04-034.starnetinc.com
Lines: 18
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!cornellcs!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!portc01.blue.aol.com!news-peer.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!news.mathworks.com!worldnet.att.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!204.178.185.19!news1.starnetinc.com!max04-034.starnetinc.com

Phil Hunt wrote:
> Is that the only made up word? What about _io_ and related words
> such as _iu_, _ia_, iom_ etc?
 
The elements of the correlative table were taken from elements of national 
languages, but the ties to the natlangs were twisted in conforming to Esperanto 
orthography and making the table regular with other parts of the table. This was 
how it was explained to me, perhaps someone else can better explain it...but it's 
not quite as 'a priori' as it looks at first glance.
 
> >Whats the distribution of tiles on a Euro-lang scrabble board?
> 
> This would depend on where the scrabble players put them.

No no how many tiles of each letter are there?
-- 
Christopher M. A. ZERVIC               E S P E R A N T O
Buffalo Grove, Illinois, Usono       lingvo de cxampionoj
