Message-ID: <32B765AE.4A2F@usa.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 21:31:58 -0600
From: Christopher ZERVIC <zervic@usa.net>
Organization: La Knabujo
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 [es] (Macintosh; I; 68K)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.uu.lang.misc,sci.lang,alt.language.artificial
Subject: Re: Naturalismo e schematicismo, no problema in linguas auxiliar
References: <57p39d$qa1@oden.abc.se> <58flei$mk3@nntp1.best.com> <58pp7f$spv@oden.abc.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
NNTP-Posting-Host: max05-118.starnetinc.com
Lines: 29
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!hood.cc.rochester.edu!news.acsu.buffalo.edu!news.uoregon.edu!tezcat!news.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!howland.erols.net!worldnet.att.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!204.178.185.19!news1.starnetinc.com!max05-118.starnetinc.com

Kjell Rehnstroem wrote:
> Then one would get:
> volapu=A8k: a posteriori, schematic
> esperanto: aposteriori with a priori elements, schematic
> Eurolang: a posteriori with a priori elements? schematic
> ido: a posteriori, no a priori elements (as far as I know), schematic
> occidental: a posteriori, schematic, naturalistic, comprehensible
> IALA:s Interlingua: a posteriori, naturalistic, comprehensible with
> elements of schematicism.

In this scheme, Basic English would go even higher than Interlingua in =

all categories.  =


Did Ido use the only word in Esperanto that was totally made up and can =

not be traced to any national language? Im talking about, of course =

_edzo_(=3Dhusband) and of course all of its forms such as edzino, edzigxi, =

praeksedzinigemulareganejo, etc.  =


Whats the distribution of tiles on a Euro-lang scrabble board?
-- =

Christopher M. A. ZERVIC               E S P E R A N T O
Buffalo Grove, Illinois, Usono       lingvo de cxampionoj
