Newsgroups: alt.journalism,misc.legal,alt.is.not,news.groups,alt.censorship,news.admin.censorship,alt.is.too,sci.lang,misc.news.internet.discuss,news.admin.policy,alt.enema,alt.culture.usenet,earth.general,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.cyberspace,alt.anal-retentives,alt.wired,alt.peeves,alt.usenet.kooks
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!scramble.lm.com!hookup!news.mathworks.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!linden.fortnet.org!coopnews.coop.net!world!boursy
From: boursy@world.std.com (Stephen Boursy)
Subject: Re: Fire David Lawrence & J.D. Falk is also a problem
Message-ID: <DoD9J9.Ay2@world.std.com>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960309055606.19251A-100000@atlantis> <4i43ns$10u@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <Do6MqD.BGH@world.std.com> <4iek45$njc@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 15:25:57 GMT
Lines: 74
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu news.groups:195125 news.admin.censorship:6849 sci.lang:51812

In article <4iek45$njc@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>, Dr. Zando 
<zando@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>boursy@world.std.com (Stephen Boursy) writes: 
>>Dr. Zando <zando@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>boursy@world.std.com (Stephen Boursy) writes: 
>>>>jdfalk@cybernothing.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>	It is also off-topic in misc.news.internet.discuss.  Please
>>>>>adjust your followups, so that this newsgroup may return to its 
>>>>>Chartered purpose
>>>
>>>"Chartered purppose" is NEVER relevant!  The CHARTER has NO
>>>jurisdiction over ANY group!
>>
>>	Yes--a charter is merely an opinion which one may accept or
>>reject at will.  A group is and becomes what it's participants 
>>choose--often times quite unconsciously.  Like an FAQ--a charter
>>is nothing more than an opinion.
>>
>>>stick you Charters up your ass!
>>>You "Charters" are just CENSORSHIP tools!
>>
>>	I agree--but J.D. has always been this way and it's doubtful
>>he can change.  He needs things very concrete and wrapped in neat
>>little boxes.
>>
>>>
>>>>>instead of being treated as a dumping-ground.  Thank you. 
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>	Oh go stuff it JD.  Maybe an enema would help--give it a try.
>>>>
>>>
>>>He does need to take a shit.  he looks fat on his web page.
>>>
>>
>>	I'll take a look--weight may be one of his problems but I
>>still think he needs an enema--he's one of the tightest asses on
>>the usenet.
>>
>>
>the problem with J.D. Falk is that he is on an "ego-trip" and
>he is still flying high.  He and Damick and Furr have elevated each
>other to being a "somebody" on Usenet, and they think of each other as
>"heroes."  Newsadministraytors like him are why usenet is such a
>terrible place right now.
>


	I agree--but I don't thing you'll find the average sys admin
thinks much of them--many are actually afraid of this Cabal--they
threaten to block feeds, cancel entire groups, issue forgeries with
regularity and try to damage financially ISP's who do not cooperate.

	One thing is sure however--with AT&T entering the game along
with other telco's and Cabal Companies on their heels--is that these
corporations will not be associating with those who issue forgeries
on others email addresses, etc.  That would be a public relations
nightmare for these corps. aside from AT&T's long history of being
a common carrier.


>J.D. Falk does forged content-cancellations weekly.


	And you are right--he's fat.  Maybe that's the problem here.

				Steve


>
>-DrZ


