Newsgroups: sci.lang
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!nntp.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!in2.uu.net!allegra!alice!rhh
From: rhh@research.att.com (Ron Hardin <9289-11216> 0112110)
Subject: Has Searle Responded to Cavell's ``Passages''?
Message-ID: <DD94AH.5D5@research.att.com>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 1995 13:32:41 GMT
Lines: 14

Stanley Cavell has recently written on the famous Searle-Derrida
debate, and I wondered if Searle had responded.

(Cavell, ``Philosophical Passages: Wittgenstein, Emerson, Austin, Derrida,''
Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge Mass, 1995.  I gather also in
``A Pitch of Philosophy'' Harvard U Press, 1994, but I have
not seen it)

It being a better reading of Austin than Derrida's, and incidentally
Searle's.

Being a Derrida enthusiast, I was surprised to see on one of Searle's
book jackets that he had demolished Derrida, and I wondered what
was in store for Cavell.
