Newsgroups: alt.politics.ec,sci.lang,soc.culture.europe,soc.culture.esperanto
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.indirect.com!bud.indirect.com!stevemac
From: stevemac@bud.indirect.com (Pascal MacProgrammer)
Subject: Esperanto? The EU?
Message-ID: <D4xtv4.H0w@indirect.com>
Sender: usenet@indirect.com (Internet Direct Admin)
Organization: Department of Redundancy Department
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 1995 22:45:04 GMT
X-Disclaimer: I have nothing to disclaim, deny, or disavow.
Lines: 23

Not so very long ago, JBENSN@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (J. BENSON) said...
>WHO REALLY NEEDS AN ARTIFICIAL LANGUAGE LIKE ESPERANTO? 
  -->  KIU JA BEZONAS FARITAN LINGVON SIMILAN AL ESPERANTO?

  No one.                              Neniu.
  Since we already have Esperanto    Ni jam havas Esperanton mem, kaj g`i
itself, and it works just fine,    funkcias bonege.  Alia lingvo simila al
another like it would be           g`i estus balasta.
redundant.
  There are people, though, in       Sed estas homoj, kiuj disvolvas
the process of developing          lingvojn =ne= similajn al Esperanto
artificial languages =not= like    (kiel Loj`bano), por ke ili eksciu (inter
Esperanto, luch as Lojban, in      aliaj demandoj) c`u tute malsama
order to see whether (among other  demars`o donus pli bonan rezulton.
things) a totally different 
approach would give better 
results.

-- 
                              ==----=                    Steve MacGregor
                             ([.] [.])                     Phoenix, AZ
--------------------------oOOo--(_)--oOOo----------------------------------
        Help stamp out, eliminate, and abolish redundancy!
