Newsgroups: sci.lang
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!library.ucla.edu!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!ames!pacbell.com!amdahl!netcomsv!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!bpc
From: bpc@netcom.com (Benjamin P. Carter)
Subject: Re: [q] why "won't"
Message-ID: <bpcCxDC11.J3F@netcom.com>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
References: <37102f$evp@hpcan240.mentorg.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 1994 19:12:36 GMT
Lines: 9

shahramn@wv.mentorg.com (Shahram Najm @ ETC) writes:


>Someone even suggested to me it should be a word
>by itself spelled "wont"! [without an apostrophe)

That suggestion is wont to cause confusion.
-- 
    Ben Carter                  internet address: bpc@netcom.com
