Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!galileo.cc.rochester.edu!prodigal.psych.rochester.edu!stevens
From: stevens@prodigal.psych.rochester.edu (Greg Stevens)
Subject: Re: AI rights (as in human rights)
Message-ID: <1995Mar25.022820.25673@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
Sender: news@galileo.cc.rochester.edu
Nntp-Posting-Host: prodigal.psych.rochester.edu
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York
References: <D5y89x.Hzq@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> <1995Mar24.175653.10531@news.media.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 95 02:28:20 GMT
Lines: 16

In <1995Mar24.175653.10531@news.media.mit.edu> minsky@media.mit.edu (Marvin Minsky) writes:
>In article <D5y89x.Hzq@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> smiles@speedy.uwaterloo.ca (Ilana Jayne Rosenshein) writes:

>>I'm looking for texts or articles on what sort of 'human rights'
>>machines would have when they become intelligent, self motivated,
>>beings (pass the Turing Test, or whatever standard exists when it happens).
>>Opinions are fine as well (I like reading them).

>That's very funny. Could you explain a possible alternative to opinion
>in this domain?  

I think the original poster was looking for references OR opinions, and
opinions were an OK option instead of references.

Greg

