Newsgroups: comp.ai.alife,comp.ai.philosophy,comp.ai,alt.consciousness
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!festival!edcogsci!jeff
From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton)
Subject: Re: Thought Question
Message-ID: <D4oA9o.Hos@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Sender: usenet@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (C News Software)
Nntp-Posting-Host: bute.aiai.ed.ac.uk
Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
References: <3hsv53$ipj@oznet03.ozemail.com.au> <3hu2u9$dde@romulus.rutgers.edu> <jqbD4GIA2.5ED@netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 1995 19:03:24 GMT
Lines: 9
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.ai.alife:2600 comp.ai.philosophy:25776 comp.ai:27796

In article <jqbD4GIA2.5ED@netcom.com> jqb@netcom.com (Jim Balter) writes:
>
>Now, you may say that "echo" isn't the right sort of programming language,
>that that's not what you meant.  But then you never said what you meant [Jeff
>Dalton would love you for that]. 

Nonsense.  My objection is to demands for definitions, not to requests
for explanations (unless they're just a refusal to make any effort to
understand or to accept any of the burden of proof).
