Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!fas-news.harvard.edu!newspump.wustl.edu!news.starnet.net!wupost!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news.media.mit.edu!minsky
From: minsky@media.mit.edu (Marvin Minsky)
Subject: Re: What's innate? (Was Re: Artificial Neural Networks and Cognition
Message-ID: <1995Jan27.013805.5038@news.media.mit.edu>
Sender: news@news.media.mit.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: MIT Media Laboratory
References: <1995Jan26.150315.1420@il.us.swissbank.com> <3g8sru$jsn@mp.cs.niu.edu> <1995Jan26.224354.401@news.media.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 1995 01:38:05 GMT
Lines: 12

In article <1995Jan26.224354.401@news.media.mit.edu> minsky@media.mit.edu (Marvin Minsky) writes:
>In article <3g8sru$jsn@mp.cs.niu.edu> rickert@cs.niu.edu (Neil Rickert) writes:
>
>>In spite of the claims of the 'poverty of stimulus' argument, we are

>Bah.  You cannot assess the "poverty" unless you have an idea of the

Oops.  I fear my "bah" might be misinterpreted.  It was to be applied to the
subject and not, as it might appear, to Rickert's statement, with
which I completely agree.

