1297 Re: A learning automaton for temporal sequences 1298 Re: More replies to jbaez 1299 Wigner's self 1300 Intelligence testing 1301 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1302 Re: Intelligence testing 1303 Re: Intelligence testing 1304 Re: More replies to jbaez 1305 Re: Intelligence testing 1306 Re: Intelligence testing 1307 Re: Ignore Searle and be happier 1308 Re: Intelligence testing 1311 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1313 Grasping concepts... is it polite? 1314 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1315 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1316 Edelman's non-computability non-argument 1317 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1318 Re: Grasping concepts... is it polite? 1319 Re: Ignore Searle and be happier 1320 Re: red light / blue light scenario 1321 Re: Grasping concepts... is it polite? 1322 Logic and the Dialectic of Enlightenment 1323 Re: Ignore Searle and be happier 1324 Re: Ignore Searle and be happier 1325 Re: Intelligence testing 1326 Re: Intelligence testing 1327 Re: Intelligence testing 1328 Re: Edelman's non-computability non-argument 1329 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1330 Re: Grasping concepts... is it polite? 1331 Re: Intelligence testing 1333 Re: Grasping concepts... is it polite? 1334 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1335 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1336 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1337 Re: Edelman's non-computability non-argument 1338 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1339 Re: Causes and Reasons 1340 Re: Grasping concepts... is it polite? 1341 Re: Grasping concepts... is it polite? 1342 Re: Ignore Searle and be happier 1343 Re: Edelman's non-computability non-argument 1344 The Rules of the Game (reply to V. Yodaiken) was Re: Searle's response to silicon brain? 1345 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1346 Re: Grasping concepts... is it polite? 1347 Re: Grasping concepts... is it polite? 1348 Re: Causes and Reasons 1349 Re: Grasping concepts... is it polite? 1350 Re: Grasping concepts... is it polite? 1351 Re: Grasping concepts... is it polite? 1352 Re: Grasping concepts... is it polite? 1353 Re: Grasping concepts... is it polite? 1355 Re: A learning automaton for temporal s 1356 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1357 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1359 Re: Searle's response to silicon brain? 1360 Problematical construct 1361 Re: Virtual Person? (was re: Searle and the Chine 1362 Re: Virtual Person? (was re: Searle and the Chine 1363 Re: Causes and Reasons 1364 Re: Causes and Reasons 1365 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1370 Re: 'understanding' 1371 Re: The Rules of the Game (reply to V. Yodaiken) was Re: Searle's response to silicon brain? 1372 Re: Edelman's non-computability non-argument 1373 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1374 Re: Intelligence testing 1375 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1376 Compliment to newsgroup submitters 1378 Re: Edelman's non-computability non-argument 1379 Re: 'understanding' 1380 Re: Waking up is hard to do, but somebody's got to do it 1381 Re: Ignore Searle and be happier 1382 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1383 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1384 Re: Causes and Reasons 1388 Re: Occam's barber had many customers 1389 Re: Searle, again 1392 Re: Searle, again 1393 Re: The Robot Reply (was Re: Searle, again) 1395 Re: Searle, again 1396 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1398 Re: A Behaviorist Approach to AI Philosophy 1399 Re: Compliment to newsgroup submitters 1400 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1402 Re: Causes and Reasons 1403 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1404 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1405 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1406 Re: Ignore Searle and be happier 1407 Re: Cargo-cult science 1408 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1409 Re: Epiphenomenal semantics 1410 Re: Causes and Reasons 1411 Re: Causes and Reasons 1413 Re: Intelligence testing 1414 Re: The Robot Reply (was Re: Searle, again) 1415 Re: Searle, again 1418 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1419 Re: Searle, again 1420 Re: Causes and Reasons 1421 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1422 Re: Understanding and the Systems Reply 1423 Re: Epiphenomenal semantics 1424 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1425 Re: Causes and Reasons 1426 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1428 Aleph-1 - What? 1430 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1432 Historical Origins of Logic 1433 "causal powers" 1434 Re: Searle, again 1438 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1439 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1441 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1442 Re: Searle, again 1443 Re: "causal powers" 1444 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1445 Re: Causes and Reasons 1446 Re: Aleph-1 - What? 1447 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1448 Re: Causes and Reasons 1449 Re: Intelligence testing 1450 Re: "causal powers" 1451 Re: Searle, again 1452 Re: Aleph-1 - What? 1453 Re: Waking up is hard to do, but somebody's got to do it 1454 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1455 Re: Aleph-1 - What? 1459 Re: Causes and Reasons 1460 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1461 Re: The Robot Reply 1462 Re: Causes and Reasons 1463 Re: Intelligence testing 1464 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1466 Re: Ignore Searle and be happier 1467 Re: Causes and Reasons 1468 Re: Searle, again 1469 Re: "causal powers" 1470 Re: "causal powers" 1471 Re: My Understanding of Understanding 1472 Re: Intelligence testing 1473 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1474 Re: The Robot Reply 1475 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1476 Re: "causal powers" 1477 Re: Causes and Reasons 1478 Re: Searle, again 1479 Re: "causal powers" 1480 Re: The Robot Reply (was Re: Searle, again) 1481 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1482 Re: Intelligence testing 1483 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1484 Re: Searle, again 1485 Re: 'understanding' 1488 Re: Intelligence testing 1490 Re: Causes and Reasons 1491 Re: Waking up is hard to do, but somebody's got to do it 1492 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1493 Re: "causal powers" 1496 scifi trivia: 1967 prediction of AI in 1992 1505 Re: "causal powers" 1506 Re: Searle, again 1507 Re: Virtual Person? (was re: Searle and the Chine 1508 Re: Causes and Reasons 1509 Re: Searle, again 1512 Re: Intelligence testing 1513 Re: "causal powers" 1514 instantiation of programs 1516 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1517 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1522 Silicon Neuron 1524 Re: Intelligence testing 1525 Re: Searle, again 1526 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1527 Re: Semantics of thoughts 1528 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1529 Re: Waking up is hard to do, but somebody's got to do it 1530 Re: Causes and Reasons 1531 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1532 Re: Semantics of thoughts 1533 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1536 Re: Ignore Searle and be happier 1540 Semantic Ether 1541 Re: Causes and Reasons 1542 Re: "causal powers" 1543 Re: Causes and Reasons 1544 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1545 The English Room 1546 Re: Intelligence testing 1547 Re: Causes and Reasons 1548 Room with a Worm's Eye View. 1550 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1551 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1552 Re: Intelligence testing 1553 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1554 Re: Searle, again 1555 Re: Intelligence testing 1556 Re: Causes and Reasons 1557 Re: Searle, again 1558 Re: instantiation of programs 1559 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1560 Behavior in the Bart Room 1561 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1562 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1563 Re: Semantic Ether 1564 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1565 re: Cargo Cult Science 1566 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1567 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1568 Re: "causal powers" 1569 Understanding. (was: Penrose on Man vs. Machine) 1570 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1571 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1573 Re: Waking up is hard to do, but somebody's got to do it 1578 Is your ontology backwards? 1579 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1580 Re: Behavior in the Bart Room 1585 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1586 re: Cargo Cult Science 1587 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1588 re: Cargo Cult Science 1589 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1590 Conference "Philosophy and the Cognitive Sciences" 1591 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1592 Re: Intelligence testing 1593 Re: Intelligence testing 1594 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1595 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1596 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1597 Re: Searle, again 1599 Re: How to outdo Roger Penrose 1600 Re: Virtual Person? 1601 Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1602 Re: Searle, again 1603 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1604 Re: Causes and Reasons 1606 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1607 Re: Is your ontology backwards? 1608 Re: Waking up is hard to do, but somebody's got to do it 1610 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1612 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1614 Re: How to outdo Roger Penrose 1615 Re: Behavior in the Bart Room 1616 Re: "causal powers" 1617 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1618 Re: Virtual Person? 1621 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1622 Re: Behavior in the Bart Room (repost) 1623 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1624 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1625 Private lives of ideal forms and formulas 1626 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1627 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1630 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1631 Re: Virtual Person? 1632 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1633 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1634 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1635 Anesthesia 1636 Impossibility of flight vs impossibility of AI 1637 Re: Causes and Reasons 1638 Re: Intelligence testing 1639 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1640 Re: "causal powers" 1641 Re: Intelligence testing 1642 Re: Intelligence testing 1643 Re: recipes 1644 Re: Semantics of thoughts 1645 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1646 Re: recipes 1648 Re: Private lives of ideal forms and formulas 1650 Building Artificial Animals (was Re: Cargo Cult Science) 1651 Re: Behavior in the Bart Room 1653 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1654 Re: Building Artificial Animals (was Re: Cargo Cult Science) 1655 Combinatorial explosion 1658 Re: Intelligence testing 1659 Re: The Rules of the Game (reply to V. Yodaiken) was Re: Searle's response to silicon brain? 1660 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1661 Re: Semantics of thoughts 1662 Re: Behavior in the Bart Room (repost) 1663 Re: Searle, again 1664 Re: Intelligence testing 1665 Re: Behavior in the Bart Room 1666 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1667 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1669 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1670 Re: Virtual Person? 1671 Re: Virtual Person? 1672 Re: Searle, again 1673 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1674 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1675 Re: Intelligence testing 1676 Re: Virtual Person? 1677 Re: Searle, again 1678 Re: "causal powers" 1679 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1680 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1681 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1683 Re: Virtual Person? 1684 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1686 Re: Combinatorial explosion 1687 Re: Intelligence testing 1688 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1689 Re: Intelligence testing 1690 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1691 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1692 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1693 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1694 Re: Waking up is hard to do, but somebody's got to do it 1695 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1696 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1697 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1698 Re: Intelligence Testing 1699 Re: Intelligence Testing 1700 Re: Impossibility of flight vs impossibility of AI 1701 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1702 Narrative Origins of the Turing Test 1703 Searle and the Curse of the Mediocre Philosophers 1704 Re: Causes and Reasons (was re: Searle and the Chinese Room) 1705 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1706 Re: Virtual Person? 1707 Re: Virtual Person? 1708 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1709 Intelligent Behaviour: Is It Alive? 1711 Do birds cause flight? 1712 Re: Causes and Reasons 1713 Re: Virtual Person? 1714 Re: Virtual Person? 1715 The Turing Test Argument 1718 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1719 Re: Intelligence Testing 1720 Re: Intelligence Testing 1721 Re: Combinatorial explosion 1723 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1724 Redefining Intelligence 1726 Is understanding algorithmic? 1727 Turing Test Finally Demystified 1728 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1729 Re: Virtual Person? 1730 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1731 Re: Virtual Person? 1732 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1733 Re: Causes and Reasons 1734 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1735 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1736 Re: Causes and Reasons 1737 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1738 Re: Causes and Reasons 1739 Re: lookup tables 1740 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1741 The One True Ideology 1745 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1747 Re: Intelligence testing 1748 Re: Impossibility of flight vs impossibility of AI 1750 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1751 Re: Do birds cause flight? 1752 Re: Redefining Intelligence 1753 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1754 Re: Private lives of ideal forms and formulas 1755 Re: Building Artificial Animals (was Re: Cargo Cult Science) 1757 Ethics and AI ( AI, software-pit-bulls, OR ...? ) 1758 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1759 Re: The Turing Test Argument 1760 Re: How to outdo Roger Penrose 1761 Re: How to outdo Roger Penrose 1763 Intelligence (?) 1764 An emperical look at AI 1765 Waiting for Baudot 1766 Re: Searle, again 1767 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1768 Re: Is understanding algorithmic? 1769 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1770 Re: Intelligence testing 1771 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1772 Re: Intelligence testing 1773 Re: Causes and Reasons 1774 Re: Virtual Person? 1775 Re: Causes and Reasons 1776 Re: Virtual Person? 1777 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1778 Re: Virtual Person? 1779 Re: Intelligence Testing 1780 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1781 Re: Intelligence Testing 1782 Re: Intelligence Testing 1783 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1784 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1787 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1788 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1789 Re: Impossibility of flight vs impossibility of AI 1790 Re: Intelligence Testing 1795 Ideals and Reality 1797 Re: Impossibility of flight vs impossibility of AI 1798 Re: Impossibility of flight vs impossibility of AI 1799 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1800 Re: Searle, again 1801 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1802 Re: Searle, again 1803 Re: Building Artificial Animals (was Re: Cargo Cult Science) 1805 Re: Anesthesia 1806 Re: Intelligence Testing 1807 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1808 Re: Impossibility of flight vs impossibility of AI 1809 Re: Searle, again 1810 Re: Anesthesia 1811 Re: Intelligence Testing 1812 Re: Searle, again 1813 Re: Searle and the Curse of the Mediocre Philosophers 1814 Re: Ethics and AI ( AI, software-pit-bulls, OR ...? ) 1815 Re: Building Artificial Animals (was Re: Cargo Cult Science) 1816 Re: Ethics and AI ( AI, software-pit-bulls, OR ...? ) 1817 Re: Intelligence Testing 1818 Re: Virtual Person? 1819 Re: Intelligence (?) 1820 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1821 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1822 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1823 Re: Building Artificial Animals (was Re: Cargo Cult Science) 1824 Re: Virtual Person? 1825 Re: Impossibility of flight vs impossibility of AI 1827 Re: Intelligence testing 1828 Re: Anesthesia 1829 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1830 Re: Impossibility of flight vs impossibility of AI 1832 Re: Intelligence testing 1834 Re: Searle and the Curse of the Mediocre Philosophers 1836 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1837 Re: Intelligence Testing 1838 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1840 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1841 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1842 Re: Intelligence Testing 1843 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1844 Re: Intelligence Testing 1846 Re: The Turing Test Argument 1848 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1849 Re: Virtual Person? 1850 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1851 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1852 Re: Causes and Reasons 1853 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1854 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1856 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1857 Re: Virtual Person? 1858 Re: Virtual Person? 1860 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1861 Re: Virtual Person? 1863 Re: Intelligence Testing 1864 Re: Intelligence testing 1865 Re: Intelligence Testing 1866 Re: Intelligence Testing 1867 Re: Intelligence Testing 1868 Re: Virtual Person? 1869 Re: Intelligence Testing 1870 Viruses: alive? 1871 Re: Evidence that would falsify strong AI. (Re: Cargo Cult Science) 1872 Re: Virtual Person? 1874 Re: Intelligence Testing 1876 Re: Intelligence Testing 1877 Re: Intelligence Testing 1879 Re: Virtual Person? 1880 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1881 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1882 Re: Impossibility of flight vs impossibility of AI 1883 Re: Searle, again 1884 Re: Intelligence Testing 1885 Re: Intelligence Testing 1886 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1887 Re: Intelligence Testing 1888 Re: Intelligence Testing 1889 Re: Intelligence Testing 1890 Re: Intelligence Testing 1892 Re: Intelligence Testing 1893 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1894 Re: Searle, again 1895 Re: Searle and the Curse of the Mediocre Philosophers 1896 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 1897 Re: Intelligence Testing 1898 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1900 Re: Intelligence Testing 1901 red light / blue light scenario: a better forum? 1903 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1904 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1905 Re: Intelligence Testing 1906 Re: Virtual Person? 1907 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1908 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 1909 Re: Intelligence Testing 1910 Re: Virtual Person? 1911 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1912 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1913 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1915 Re: Virtual Person? 1916 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1917 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1918 Re: Searle, again 1919 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1921 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1922 Re: Intelligence Testing 1923 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1924 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1925 Re: Intelligence testing 1926 Re: Searle and the Curse of the Mediocre Philosophers 1927 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1928 Re: Intelligence Testing 1929 Re: Intelligence Testing 1930 Re: Ethics and AI ( AI, software-pit-bulls, OR ...? ) 1931 Dr. FOLamour 1932 Re: Intelligence Testing 1934 Re: Intelligence Testing 1935 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1936 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 1937 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1938 Re: Intelligence Testing 1939 Re: Building Artificial Animals (was Re: Cargo Cult Science) 1940 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1941 Re: Intelligence Testing 1942 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1943 Re: Searle and the Curse of the Mediocre Philosop 1944 Re: The Rules of the Game (reply to V. Yodaiken) was Re: Searle's response to silicon brain? 1945 Re: Viruses: alive? 1946 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1947 Re: Viruses: alive? 1949 HIV: smarter than human? 1950 Three problems with concluding neural nets are in our noses 1952 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1953 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1954 Re: Intelligence Testing 1955 Re: Virtual Person? 1956 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1957 Re: Intelligence Testing 1958 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 1959 Re: red light / blue light scenario: a better forum? 1960 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1961 Re: Intelligence Testing 1962 Re: Intelligence Testing 1963 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1964 Re: Impossibility of flight vs impossibility of AI 1965 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1966 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1967 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1970 Re: Intelligence Testing 1971 "The proof from A.I." 1972 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1973 Re: Building Artificial Animals (was Re: Cargo Cult Science) 1974 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1975 Re: Searle and the Curse of the Mediocre Philosophers 1976 Philosophy of comp.ai.philosophy 1977 Re: Viruses: alive? 1978 Re: Evidence that would falsify strong AI. (Re: Cargo Cult Science) 1979 Re: Building Artificial Animals (was Re: Cargo Cult Science) 1980 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1981 Re: Intelligence Testing 1983 Re: red light / blue light scenario: a better forum? 1984 Re: Is understanding algorithmic? 1985 Re: Intelligence Testing 1986 Re: Is understanding algorithmic? 1987 Re: Intelligence Testing 1988 Implementation (was: Re: Causes and Reasons) 1989 Humongous table-lookup misapprehensions 1990 Re: Intelligence Testing 1991 Re: Intelligence Testing 1995 Re: Intelligence Testing 1998 Re: Intelligence Testing 2000 Re: Viruses: alive? 2002 Re: Intelligence Testing 2004 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 2005 Thought as an evolutionary process. 2006 Re: Viruses: alive? 2008 Re: Intelligence Testing 2010 Re: red light / blue light scenario 2012 Re: Intelligence Testing 2013 Re: Intelligence Testing 2014 Re: Intelligence Testing 2016 Re: Intelligence Testing 2017 Re: Intelligence Testing 2018 Re: Intelligence Testing 2021 Re: Intelligence Testing 2022 Re: Intelligence Testing 2023 Re: Intelligence Testing 2024 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 2025 Re: Is understanding algorithmic? 2026 Re: Intelligence Testing 2027 Re: Intelligence Testing 2028 Re: Intelligence Testing 2029 Re: Viruses: alive? 2030 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2031 Publication Announcemt:COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE:Special Issue on NLG 2032 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2033 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 2034 Re: Intelligence Testing 2035 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 2036 Re: Intelligence Testing 2037 Re: Intelligence Testing 2038 Re: Intelligence Testing 2039 Re: Intelligence Testing 2040 Re: Intelligence Testing 2042 Re: Intelligence Testing 2043 Re: Intelligence Testing 2044 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 2045 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2047 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 2055 Narrativity 2056 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 2057 Re: Is understanding algorithmic? 2059 Re: Intelligence Testing 2060 Re: Intelligence Testing 2062 Turing Test 2063 Re: Humongous table-lookup misapprehensions 2064 Re: Intelligence Testing 2065 les decrets du roi de soleil 2066 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2067 Re: Virtual Person? 2068 Re: Intelligence Testing 2069 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 2070 Re: Intelligence Testing 2071 Re: Intelligence Testing 2072 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 2073 Re: Intelligence Testing 2074 Re: Humongous table-lookup misapprehensions 2075 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 2076 Re: Is understanding algorithmic? 2077 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 2079 Re: Intelligence Testing 2080 Re: Implementation (was: Re: Causes and Reasons) 2081 Re: Intelligence Testing 2082 Re: Evidence that would falsify strong AI. (Re: Cargo Cult Science) 2083 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 2084 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 2085 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 2086 Re: Viruses: alive? 2087 Re: Intelligence Testing 2088 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 2094 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2095 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2101 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2102 Re: Intelligence Testing 2103 Re: Intelligence Testing 2104 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2105 Re: Virtual Person? 2106 Re: Virtual Person? 2107 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2108 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2109 Re: Intelligence Testing 2110 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2111 Re: Virtual Person? 2112 Re: Virtual Person? 2113 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2114 Finitude and Foundations 2115 Re: Turing Test 2116 Re: les decrets du roi de soleil 2118 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2119 Re: Two Materialisms (Was: Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism) 2120 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2121 Re: Intelligence Testing 2122 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 2123 Re: Intelligence Testing 2124 Re: Intelligence Testing 2125 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychismdir 2126 Re: Intelligence Testing 2127 Re: Intelligence Testing 2128 Re: Intelligence Testing 2130 Re: Intelligence Testing 2131 Re: Two Materialisms (Was: Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism) 2132 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 2134 Re: red light / blue light scenario 2135 Re: Turing Test 2136 Conference on Cognition and Representation 2138 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2139 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychismdir 2142 Re: Two Materialisms (Was: Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism) 2143 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2146 Re: Intelligence Testing 2147 Re: Intelligence Testing 2148 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual person?) 2151 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2152 Re: red light / blue light scenario 2153 Re: Viruses: alive? 2154 Re: Intelligence Testing 2155 Re: les decrets du roi de soleil 2156 Re: les decrets du roi de soleil 2157 Re: Humongous table-lookup misapprehensions 2158 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2159 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2162 Re: Viruses: alive? 2163 Re: Two Materialisms (Was: Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism) 2166 Re: Intelligence Testing 2169 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2175 Thermostats, consciousness and derived intentionality 2176 "Understanding" (was Evidence that would falsify strong AI.) 2177 Re: Intelligence Testing 2178 Generosity, a theory. ( Never MIND ! , "the medium is the message !) 2180 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 2181 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2182 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual person?) 2183 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2192 Re: Viruses: alive? 2219 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 2226 Re: Humongous table-lookup misapprehensions 2227 Re: Intelligence Testing 1309 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1310 Re: Ignore Searle and be happier 1312 Re: Intelligence testing 1332 Re: Machine Translation (was re: Searle's response to silicon brain?) 1354 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1358 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1366 Re: Ignore Searle and be happier 1367 Re: Machine Translation (was re: Searle's response to silicon brain?) 1368 Re: Grasping concepts... is it polite? 1369 How to outdo Roger Penrose 1377 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1385 Re: Grasping concepts... is it polite? 1386 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1387 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1390 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1391 Re: Logic and the Dialectic of Enlightenment 1394 Re: Causes and Reasons 1397 Re: Ignore Searle and be happier 1401 My Understanding of Understanding 1412 Understanding and the Systems Reply 1416 Re: Edelman's non-computability non-argument 1417 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1427 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1429 Re: Epiphenomenal semantics 1431 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1435 Re: The Robot Reply 1436 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1437 Re: Intelligence testing 1440 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1456 Re: Ignore Searle and be happier 1457 Re: Historical Origins of Logic 1458 Re: Cargo-cult science 1486 Re: 'understanding' 1487 Re: Understanding and the Systems Reply 1489 Re: Virtual Person? (was re: Searle and the Chine 1494 Semantics of thoughts 1495 Re: How to outdo Roger Penrose 1497 Re: Historical Origins of Logic 1498 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1499 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1500 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1501 Re: How to outdo Roger Penrose 1502 Re: "causal powers" 1503 Re: Searle, again 1504 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1510 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1511 Re: How to outdo Roger Penrose 1515 Re: Waking up is hard to do, but somebody's got to do it 1518 Re: Causes and Reasons 1519 Re: Intelligence testing 1520 Re: Causes and Reasons 1521 Re: Intelligence testing 1523 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1534 Re: Artificial Wisdom versus Artificial Intelligence 1535 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1537 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1538 Re: Semantics of thoughts 1539 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1549 Re: Searle, again 1572 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1574 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1575 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1576 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1577 re: Cargo Cult Science 1581 Re: Searle, again 1582 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1583 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1584 Re: 1598 Re: Virtual Person? 1605 Re: Virtual Person? 1609 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1611 Re: How to outdo Roger Penrose 1613 Re: Semantics of thoughts 1619 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1620 Re: Searle, again 1628 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1629 Re: Virtual Person? 1647 Re: Virtual Person? 1649 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1652 Re: Virtual Person? 1656 Re: Building Artificial Animals (was Re: Cargo Cult Science) 1657 Re: Intelligence testing 1668 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1682 Re: Virtual Person? 1685 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1710 Re: Intelligence Testing 1716 Re: Searle and the Chinese Room 1717 Is understanding algorithmic? 1722 Re: Virtual Person? 1725 Re: Virtual Person? 1742 Intelligence=retrieval, learning=storage, memory=lookup table (was: Re: lookup tables) 1743 table look-up 1744 Re: Virtual Person 1746 Re: Intelligence Testing 1749 Re: Intelligence Testing 1756 Re: Intelligence Testing 1762 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1785 Re: Impossibility of flight vs impossibility of AI 1786 Adaptive intelligence. 1791 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1792 Re: Intelligence Testing 1793 Re: Penrose on Man vs. Machine 1794 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1796 Re: Virtual Person? 1804 Re: Intelligence Testing 1826 Evidence that would falsify strong AI. (Re: Cargo Cult Science) 1831 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1833 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1835 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1839 Re: Intelligence Testing 1845 Re: Intelligence Testing 1847 Re: Searle, again 1855 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1859 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1862 Re: Is understanding algorithmic? 1873 Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 1875 Re: Searle and the Curse of the Mediocre Philosophers 1878 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 1891 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 1899 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 1902 Re: Intelligence Testing 1914 Possiblity of FTL Travel vs Possibility of AI 1920 Re: Cargo Cult Science 1933 Re: red light / blue light scenario: a better forum? 1948 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 1951 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1968 Re: Table-lookup Chinese speaker 1982 Re: Intelligence Testing 1992 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 1993 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 1994 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 1996 Re: "The proof from A.I." 1997 Re: Intelligence Testing 1999 Re: red light / blue light scenario 2001 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 2003 Re: Intelligence Testing 2007 Virtual authors 2009 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2011 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2015 Re: Intelligence Testing 2019 Re: Viruses: alive? 2020 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2041 Publicn Announcemt: Computational Intelligence: Spl Issue on NLG 2046 Re: Cargo Cult Science 2048 Re: Intelligence Testing 2049 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2050 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2051 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2052 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2053 Re: Intelligence Testing 2054 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2058 Re: Intelligence Testing 2061 Re: Intelligence Testing 2078 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2089 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2090 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2091 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2092 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2093 Re: Intelligence Testing 2096 Re: Intelligence Testing 2097 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2098 Re: Searle Agrees with Strong AI? 2099 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2100 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2117 Two Materialisms (Was: Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism) 2129 Re: Intelligence Testing 2133 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2137 Re: Evidence that would falsify strong AI. 2140 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2141 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2144 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2145 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2149 Illustrated Chinese Room 2150 Re: Two Materialisms (Was: Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism) 2161 Re: Intelligence Testing 2164 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2165 Re: Intelligence Testing 2167 Re: red light / blue light scenario 2168 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2170 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2171 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2172 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2173 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2174 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2179 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual person?) 2184 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2185 Re: Strong AI and Panpsychism 2186 Re: Strong AI and panpsychism (was Re: Virtual Person?) 2188 Re: Humongous table-lookup misapprehensions