Newsgroups: comp.ai.genetic,comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
From: adam@comptech.demon.co.uk (Adam Goodfellow)
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!MathWorks.Com!udel!news.sprintlink.net!demon!comptech.demon.co.uk!adam
Subject: Re: Acorn vs IBM PC standard
References: <33vjn1$kba$2@mhadf.inhouse.compuserve.com> <343e9k$agn@cantua.canterbury.ac.nz> <3449tu$ll9@doc.armltd.co.uk>
Reply-To: adam@comptech.demon.co.uk
Organization: Computech
Distribution: world
Lines: 13
X-Newsreader: Archimedes ReadNews
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 1994 14:08:13 +0000
Message-ID: <8BvJ5Gj030n@comptech.demon.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.ai.genetic:3804 comp.sys.acorn.advocacy:3879

michael.williams@armltd.co.uk (Michael Williams) writes:

Doug Davidson <100072.2053@CompuServe.COM> writes:
> I remain convinced that the benefits of standard world-wide tools 
> and applications running on IBM PC compatible systems is the only 
> honest and decent thing to sell to schools. It is immoral to sell 
> non-standard equipment such as Acorn machines to schools.
> 

Well at least Acorn are honest is saying it aint a IBM PC Comptible, and
also its better to be non-standrd than sub-standard...

Adam

