Final standings:
			W	L	T	+/-	Pts
1 Marmer/Patel		14	 1	 1	+276	29
2 Manista/Shiue/White	12	 2	 2	+135	26
3 Burns/Morales		 9	 3	 4	+142	22
4 Schumacher		 7	 5	 4	 +45	18
5 Jacobowitz/Sheldon	 7	 9	 0	  +1	14
6 Gupta/Harvey		 6	 9	 1	 -28	13
7 Roques		 5	11	 0	 -99	10
8 Davidson		 4	12	 0	-104	 8
9 Gable			 2	14	 0	-368	 4

Games as player 1:
			W	L	T	+/-	Pts
1 Marmer/Patel		 7	 0	 1	+139	15
2 Manista/Shiue/White	 7	 0	 1	 +81	15
3 Schumacher		 5	 1	 2	 +53	12
4 Gupta/Harvey		 5	 2	 1	 +85	11
5 Burns/Morales		 5	 2	 1	 +65	11
6 Jacobowitz/Sheldon	 5	 3	 0	 +19	10
7 Davidson		 3	 5	 0	  -1	 6
8 Roques		 3	 5	 0	 -43	 6
9 Gable			 2	 6	 0	-136	 4

Games as player 2:
			W	L	T	+/-	Pts
1 Marmer/Patel		 7	 1	 0	+137	14
2 Burns/Morales		 4	 1	 3	 +77	11
3 Manista/Shiue/White	 5	 2	 1	 +54	11
4 Schumacher		 2	 4	 2	  -8	 6
5 Jacobowitz/Sheldon	 2	 6	 0	 -18	 4
6 Roques		 2	 6	 0	 -56	 4
7 Davidson		 1	 7	 0	-103	 2
8 Gupta/Harvey		 1	 7	 0	-113	 2
9 Gable			 0	 8	 0	-232	 0

Games:
player 1\player2	   1	   2	   3	   4	   5	   6	   7	   8	   9
1 Burns/Morales		   #	  +35	   -4	    0	   +7	  +23	  +25	  -22	   +1
2 Gable			  -30	   #	  -34	  -24	  -32	  +11	  +35	  -32	  -30
3 Marmer/Patel		    0	  +17	   #	  +23	  +11	  +27	  +23	  +19	  +19
4 Schumacher		    0	  +35	  -28	   #	    0	  +17	   +5	  +17	   +7
5 Manista/Shiue/White	    0	  +33	   +3	   +3	   #	   +5	  +17	  +15	   +5
6 Gupta/Harvey		   +1	  +27	  -12	    0	   -4	   #	  +25	  +21	  +27
7 Davidson		  -24	  +35	  -24	   +7	   -6	   -4	   #	  +35	  -20
8 Roques		  -18	  +31	  -18	  -26	  -16	  +29	  -34	   #	   +9
9 Jacobowitz/Sheldon	   -6	  +19	  -20	  +25	  -14	   +5	   +7	   +3	   #

Gable using depth 3 (some randomized behavior)
Marmer/Patel using level 9
Schumacher using random gene
Manista/Shuie/White using goodsix
Gupta/Harvey using depth 6
Davidson using fixed heuristic with depth 4
Roques using AlphaBetaComputerPlayer4
Jacobowitz/Sheldon using ab3:3