Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.postmodern,sci.lang,alt.feminism,alt.fan.camille-paglia
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!scramble.lm.com!news.math.psu.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!torn!watserv3.uwaterloo.ca!news
From: jmkinnib@watarts.uwaterloo.ca (Ghostboy)
Subject: Re: Lesbian feminists?  (was: same old)
Message-ID: <31ba9271.2268491@news.uwaterloo.ca>
Sender: news@watserv3.uwaterloo.ca
Nntp-Posting-Host: cnts3p06.uwaterloo.ca
Organization: University of Waterloo
References: <hatunenDs6876.53F@netcom.com>  <4oj2j5$nqv@dfw-ixnews8.ix.netcom.com> <4ojivc$lf1@agate.berkeley.edu>  <sprague.25-3105190214390001@ts24-9.homenet.ohio-state.edu>  <4p98ra$isp@epsilon. <31b8db38.246798056@news.uwaterloo.ca> <DsoMpy.IE7@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <31b9f1c6.9798624@news.uwaterloo.ca> <4pdelb$oge@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 1996 09:00:56 GMT
Lines: 41
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu sci.skeptic:178689 sci.lang:55437

On 9 Jun 1996 02:58:51 GMT, recook77@ix.netcom.com(Robin E. Cook)
annoyed the censors with:

>In <31b9f1c6.9798624@news.uwaterloo.ca> jmkinnib@watarts.uwaterloo.ca
>(Ghostboy) writes: 
>>
>>On Sat, 8 Jun 1996 12:58:46 GMT, dcs2e@darwin.clas.virginia.edu (David
>>Swanson) annoyed the censors with:
>>
>>>In article <31b8db38.246798056@news.uwaterloo.ca>
>>>jmkinnib@watarts.uwaterloo.ca (Ghostboy) writes:
>>>
>>>> 
>>>> Heterosexual love and Heterosexual rape
>>>> and 
>>>> Homosexual love and Homosexual rape
>>>> 
>>>> (love meaning a loving sexual relationship)
>>>> 
>>>> then why is it so ludicrous to point out that it is possible for
>>>> adult/child love 
>>>> as well as 
>>>> adult/child rape.
>>>
>>>Because children often react as if they've been raped, even in the
>>>cases of alleged love.  I'm not talking about 17 year olds, but about
>>>14 year olds.
>>>
>(snip)
>
>Plus...why don't these grownups go find sexual partners their own age,
>hmmmmmmmmm?  

or why cant gay males just find sexual partners of the 'proper' sex.

>
>I mean, I wonder why the NAMBLA gang go after young boys.  Could it
>really be sexual attraction to children?

I cant speak for NAMBLA.
Ghostboy --- A non-practicing Atheist
