Newsgroups: sci.lang
From: philip@storcomp.demon.co.uk (Phil Hunt)
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!peernews.demon.co.uk!storcomp.demon.co.uk!philip
Subject: Re: Esperanto-English
References: <3k9d80$1t0@nz12.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <D5LCt2.70K@tigadmin.ml.com>
Reply-To: philip@storcomp.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.27
Lines: 12
X-Posting-Host: storcomp.demon.co.uk
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 1995 18:59:17 +0000
Message-ID: <795639557snz@storcomp.demon.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk

In article <D5LCt2.70K@tigadmin.ml.com>
           pardoej@lonnds.ml.com "Julian Pardoe LADS LDN X1428" writes:
> On the whole, I'd say that grammatically E-o is less similar to the Romance
> languages than it might seem at first sight.  The forms might appear Romance
> but the way they're used is often not Romance-like. 

Does any natural language have the same system of participles as E-o?


-- 
Phil Hunt...philip@storcomp.demon.co.uk
"on no pos fac omelet, opcum brekigation ovums"
