Newsgroups: comp.robotics
Path: brunix!sgiblab!swrinde!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.ans.net!paperboy.amoco.com!hawkings!natos114!zjoc01
From: zjoc01@hou.amoco.com (Jack Coats)
Subject: Re: CCNC vs. Laser Printers
Message-ID: <1994Mar21.163247.6317@amoco.com>
Sender: news@amoco.com
Reply-To: zjoc01@hou.amoco.com
Organization: Amoco
References: <2me9jg$4r7@nwfocus.wa.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 1994 16:32:47 CST
Lines: 12

I was wondering, how about using a scratch awl, and very thin 
cladding.  It might be able to produce acceptable results for
one-off, low power applications, and possibly do it on flexable
substrates (flexable PC boards).

Any ideas?


---
#include(standard-disclaimer.h);
E-mail: jocoats@amoco.com   Fax: 713/366-7570   Voice: 713/366-7120

