Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!udel!news.mathworks.com!hookup!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!festival!edcogsci!jeff
From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton)
Subject: Re: CL grammar ambiguities?
Message-ID: <D45LII.LAF@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Sender: usenet@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (C News Software)
Nntp-Posting-Host: bute-alter.aiai.ed.ac.uk
Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
References: <D3zzCo.z4@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> <547i1c1w165w@sytex.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 1995 16:51:54 GMT
Lines: 18

In article <547i1c1w165w@sytex.com> smcl@sytex.com (Scott McLoughlin) writes:
>jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton) writes:
>
>> >        Good point.  Are there any 100% portable CL sources
>> >available that implement a Lisp reader and that are PD.
>> 
>> What do you mean by 100% portable?  Some of them are in C and
>> are as portable as C usually is. 
>
>        I meant portable CL code. I don't care if Lisp 
>readers are available in portable PL/M, ADA, APL or COBOL.
>Same for C.  

But what do you mean by 100% portable?  Conforming to the ANSI
standard?  Actually runnable w/ no #+ or #- in all Common Lisps?



