Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!cornell!travelers.mail.cornell.edu!news.kei.com!news.mathworks.com!hookup!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!dircon!rheged!simon
From: simon@rheged.dircon.co.uk (Simon Brooke)
Subject: Re: L'OBJET: A new journal (in French) on object technology.
Message-ID: <D3tyyp.59J@rheged.dircon.co.uk>
Organization: none. Disorganization: total.
References: <3g66i5$bmb@vienna.eiffel.com> <davidt-3101951904510001@192.0.2.1> <3gms4q$n2v@ceylon.gte.com> <MARCOXA.95Feb2082808@mosaic.nyu.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 1995 10:11:11 GMT
Lines: 20


In article <MARCOXA.95Feb2082808@mosaic.nyu.edu>,
Marco Antoniotti <marcoxa@mosaic.nyu.edu> wrote:
>Maybe we should all revert to more serious international languages,
>like Latin or Sanscrit (the first being more economically feasable
>since we would not have to reimplement the character set)
>
>Carpe Diem!
>

Gin ye canna scrieve i Scots, fit for dae ye scrieve ava?

	-- Yae thocht ae for th guid fowk o comp.lang.lisp

-- 
------- simon@rheged.dircon.co.uk (Simon Brooke)

	'there are no solutions, only precipitates'

	
