Newsgroups: comp.lang.clos,comp.lang.dylan,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.icon,comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.prolog,comp.lang.scheme,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.tcl,comp.lang.perl
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!cornellcs!travelers.mail.cornell.edu!news.kei.com!simtel!noc.netcom.net!netcom.com!nagle
From: nagle@netcom.com (John Nagle)
Subject: Re: what to use instead of TCL or PERL
Message-ID: <nagleDF6IEA.8EJ@netcom.com>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
References: <43d0g9$aal@magus.cs.utah.edu> <43mipn$d53@news1.delphi.com>
Distribution: inet
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 00:51:45 GMT
Lines: 8
Sender: nagle@netcom9.netcom.com
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.lang.clos:3497 comp.lang.dylan:5238 comp.lang.eiffel:10941 comp.lang.icon:3273 comp.lang.lisp:19133 comp.lang.prolog:13877 comp.lang.scheme:13771 comp.lang.smalltalk:28528 comp.lang.tcl:35534

"George J. Carrette" <gjc@delphi.com> writes:
>carr@fast.cs.utah.edu (Harold Carr) wrote:
>>What do programmers who implement and use real programming languages
>>like, Lisp, Prolog, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Icon, etc; use instead of TCL or PERL?

      Either Visual Basic or Java is a decent choice for little programs.

					John Nagle
