Newsgroups: comp.ai.alife,comp.ai.philosophy,comp.ai,alt.consciousness
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!hudson.lm.com!netline-fddi.jpl.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!utgpu!pindor
From: pindor@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca (Andrzej Pindor)
Subject: Re: Thought Question
Message-ID: <D1wJDp.4xq@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca>
Organization: UTCC Public Access
References: <3dfhkq$gov@news.worldlink.com> <3dk7vu$43q@netaxs.com> <3e2rv2$elt@clarknet.clark.net> <3ed9ga$729@cmcl2.NYU.EDU>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 1995 22:20:12 GMT
Lines: 20
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.ai.alife:1630 comp.ai.philosophy:24306 comp.ai:26221

In article <3ed9ga$729@cmcl2.NYU.EDU>, bulkina <bulkina@acf4.nyu.edu> wrote:
........
>is to make a machine do as many operations like a human as possible. Although 
>I am a CS major and have a deep interest in AI, I think that we have to deel
>with the fact that no machine can ever be human. It can be like human. VERY 
                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>like human. But to make a human it takes either a god, or a woman. Either way
>it is beyond the point of AI. 8^)  
>
Is the above true by definition or by fiat?
> 
>-- alex 
>

Andrzej
-- 
Andrzej Pindor                        The foolish reject what they see and 
University of Toronto                 not what they think; the wise reject
Instructional and Research Computing  what they think and not what they see.
pindor@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca                           Huang Po
