From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!unmvax!constellation!hardy.math.okstate.edu!gindrup Mon May 25 14:05:34 EDT 1992
Article 5671 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!unmvax!constellation!hardy.math.okstate.edu!gindrup
>From: gindrup@math.okstate.edu (Eric `'d'kidd' G..)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Intelligence is dead
Message-ID: <1992May15.031629.15801@math.okstate.edu>
Date: 15 May 92 03:16:29 GMT
References: <1992May13.220801.26052@access.usask.ca>
Organization: Oklahoma State University, Math Department
Lines: 15

In article <1992May13.220801.26052@access.usask.ca> choy@skorpio.usask.ca writes:
>A person is made of matter, chemicals. The person can only do what the
>chemicals dictate. There are no choices. There is no intelligence. A
>person responds to his/her environment, and a computer can be made to
>respond similarly. When we look at the program the computer is running,
>we say it's just an algorithm, there's no intelligence. When we look
>at a person we see just his forced reaction. No intelligence.
>
Try,
print "I am more intelligent than you; I don't ever worry about my actions."
print "Since, this is the case, I must have more advanced powers of"
print "deduction than you.  In fact I never worry.  Also, I also know"
print "exactly what I am going to do next -- Try to refute it!"
;-)
-- Eric Gindrup ! gindrup@hardy.math.okstate.edu


