From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!aiai!jeff Wed Feb 26 12:54:08 EST 1992
Article 3975 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.ecf!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!aiai!jeff
>From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Functionalist Theory of Qualia
Message-ID: <6253@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 24 Feb 92 18:58:11 GMT
References: <1992Feb7.203648.8033@cs.yale.edu> <1992Feb10.032900.27301@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> <1992Feb14.043043.14861@cs.yale.edu>
Sender: news@aiai.ed.ac.uk
Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
Lines: 9

>  In article <1992Feb10.032900.27301@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> chalmers@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (David Chalmers) writes:
>
>  >This is where I disagree, obviously.  You and I both know that this
>  >talk of "self-models" and so on is just a shorthand way of talking
>  >about certain kinds of behavioural dispositions, complex mechanisms
>  >of internal causation, and so on. 

So what is "behavioural disposition" short for?  I find it a lot less
clear than "self-model".


