From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!aukuni.ac.nz!kcbbs!kc Wed Feb 26 12:53:52 EST 1992
Article 3950 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!aukuni.ac.nz!kcbbs!kc
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Intelligence Testing
Message-ID: <3892.559247@kcbbs.gen.nz>
>From: Hakki_Kocabas@kcbbs.gen.nz (Hakki Kocabas)
Date: 25 Feb 92 01:04:52 GMT
References: <43808@dime.cs.umass.edu>
Organization: Kappa Crucis Unix BBS, Auckland, New Zealand
Lines: 9

It is not necessary that a three years old child "believe in the intelligence 
of a talking frog" to talk to it. It is just another game for the child 
to learn how to use the language. That's why after sometime, when s/he 
doesn't get the same result to talk to a frog and to you, s/he'd better
talk to you, to get a result by using language. 
Even that doesn't make her/him "believe in the intelligence of a talking 
man", because s/he didn't learn how to use "intelligence" and "believe 
in" yet, has s/he? :-)



