From newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wupost!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!libra.wistar.upenn.edu Thu Feb 20 15:21:46 EST 1992
Article 3833 of comp.ai.philosophy:
Path: newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wupost!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!libra.wistar.upenn.edu
>From: weemba@libra.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Wanted: Critique of Emperor's New Mind
Message-ID: <66502@netnews.upenn.edu>
Date: 18 Feb 92 17:45:51 GMT
References: <1992Feb14.172433.15414@access.usask.ca> <mike.698114077@psych.ualberta.ca> <1992Feb17.011511.3193@skynet.uucp>
Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu
Reply-To: weemba@libra.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Organization: The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology
Lines: 11
Nntp-Posting-Host: libra.wistar.upenn.edu
In-reply-to: ice@skynet.uucp (Ice)

In article <1992Feb17.011511.3193@skynet.uucp>, ice@skynet (Ice) writes:
>It is an interesting book with many fascinating explorations, but
>to make the claim that human neurons are subject to the uncertainty
>of quantum physics (which the author, Penrose is a leader in) is an
>attempt to overstep authority which is unbecoming.

How so?  Everything is subject to quantum uncertainty.

If you have an actual criticism, state it. 
-- 
-Matthew P Wiener (weemba@libra.wistar.upenn.edu)


