Newsgroups: comp.ai.alife
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!oitnews.harvard.edu!purdue!lerc.nasa.gov!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!sdd.hp.com!night.primate.wisc.edu!relay!oacs!jlynch
From: "James P. Lynch III" <jlynch@oacs.nswc.navy.mil>
Subject: Scientific American article
X-Sender: jlynch@oacs
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950622215010.5615C-100000@oacs>
Sender: news@relay.nswc.navy.mil
Organization: Naval Surface Warfare Center - Dahlgren Div.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 1995 01:53:11 GMT
Lines: 6

    The article wasn't bad; what was tacky was the headline.  'Sham' is a 
very negatively loaded word, with connotations of premeditated malice.  
Appropriate for a tabloid maybe, but not a reputable publication.

**** James P. "Jim" Lynch, III **** 

