Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!NewsWatcher!user
From: bastion1@netcom.com (Gregory & Jennifer Weston)
Subject: Re: Are there C++ vs. ST figures?
Message-ID: <bastion1-1603960756320001@10.0.2.15>
Sender: bastion1@netcom2.netcom.com
Organization: Bastion Products
References: <expertek.315.005A3A52@aone.com> <3144AEC6.678B@oose.com.au>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 07:56:29 GMT
Lines: 16

In article <3144AEC6.678B@oose.com.au>, Philip Haynes
<p.haynes@oose.com.au> wrote:

>I did a study a couple of years back where I wrote a system in C++ &
>then rewrote it in Smalltalk. ...

If you wrote in C++ and then rewrote in Smalltalk, you had increased your
familiarity with the problem, giving Smalltalk a distinct edge. How did
you counteract the impact that had on the time it took you to build a
solution?

Greg

-- 
Bastion Products: Where classic quality meets modern technology.
Actually, this post does represent the opinions of Bastion Products. How's that for a switch?
