Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!news.mathworks.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!swidir.switch.ch!swsbe6.switch.ch!surfnet.nl!sun4nl!news
From: mzomer@inter.nl.net (mzomer)
Subject: Re: Persistency FrameWork
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: ztm99-21.zoetermeer.nl.net
Message-ID: <DnrBKs.12p@solair1.inter.NL.net>
Sender: news@solair1.inter.NL.net (News at news)
Reply-To: mzomer@asd.bso.nl
Organization: ORIGIN
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.9
References: <DnpM7J.4vL@solair1.inter.NL.net> <4hd7c4$mu2@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 03:59:23 GMT
Lines: 24

In article <4hd7c4$mu2@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, dogmat@aol.com says...
>
>>I am looking for a good Persistency Framework that does not have any
>>implications on existing code. We use Team/V 3.0.1 from Digitalk (on
>>a OS/2 platform) and store our business objects in a DB2/2 or Oracle 
>>database. Before building our own Framework I want to hear from you!
>
>Your lead-in is too general. Are you going to build your own persistent
>database ....
The database is already in place, DB/2 and Oracle. I am looking for
Framework the maps objects to a Rational Database and back. As I told
before the Framework is not allowed to have any implications on 
existing Smalltalk classes.

>...or look at a commerical one or what? What is wrong with your
>current setup?
The problem with my current setup is that I have to write it myself.
I am sure that I am not the first one who trying to solve this
problem!

CU

--martin

