Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.misc
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!gatech!news.mathworks.com!news.ultranet.com!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!ftpbox!mothost!schbbs!news
From: shang@corp.mot.com (David L. Shang)
Subject: Re: Types, types: static vs. dynamic -- classification
Reply-To: shang@corp.mot.com
Organization: MOTOROLA 
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 18:53:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1995Sep29.185300.9080@schbbs.mot.com>
References: <DFHwFy.6v5@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Sender: news@schbbs.mot.com (SCHBBS News Account)
Nntp-Posting-Host: 129.188.128.126
Lines: 27
Xref: glinda.oz.cs.cmu.edu comp.object:38825 comp.lang.smalltalk:28837 comp.lang.c++:151727 comp.lang.misc:23203

In article <DFHwFy.6v5@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> sdm7g@elvis.med.Virginia.EDU  
(Steven D. Majewski) writes:
> In article <1995Sep21.101011.alice@wonderland.com>
> Harry Pilosus <caterpillar@wonderland.com> writes:
> >
> >As I said, each type system or particular language has its
> >own definition. I am not going to argue with you what name
> >should be used for what definition.
> >
> 
> Huzzah!
> Meaning is TYRANNY - distinction IS discrimination.
> We will never KNOW true freedom until we EACH speak our
> OWN TRUE LANGUAGE.   Burn all dictionaries NOW.
>
 
Steven,

If you can present a set of standard names that can please
everyone, please do so.

My inability to set up a standardized terminology in this
very particular area is not responsible for people who are
going to burn all dictionaries.

David

