Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!nntp.sei.cmu.edu!news.psc.edu!hudson.lm.com!news.math.psu.edu!news.cac.psu.edu!newsserver.jvnc.net!newsserver2.jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!news.voicenet.com!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!netcomsv!uu3news.netcom.com!netcomsv!uucp3.netcom.com!slcgate!servio!bruce@slc.com
From: bruce@slc.com (Bruce Schuchardt)
Subject: RDBMS interface
Message-ID: <bruce.808154984@servio>
Summary: what is the best interface to relational databases?
Keywords: rdbms
Lines: 38
Sender: news@slc.com (USENET News)
Nntp-Posting-Host: servio
Organization: GemStone Systems, Inc., Beaverton OR, USA
Date: 11 Aug 95 15:29:44 GMT

I've seen a lot of gripes about one Smalltalk relational interface or another,
but few people who haven't written their own interface have actually said
anything good about available commercial relational database interfaces
for Smalltalk.

I think people would be interested in a report of others' experiences
with these products.

If you're using a relational database interface that wasn't written in-house,
would you please drop me a note?  Let me know if you want to remain
anonymous.  I'll consolidate all responses and post the results.

I'd like to know

a) What relational database interface you use.

b) What database(s) you use it with.

c) On a scale of 1-10, how satisfied are you with the product?

d) Anything else you want to add.



Thanks!

Bruce Schuchardt
bruce@slc.com
-- 
  Bruce Schuchardt
  GemStone Systems, Inc.
  bruce@slc.com

