Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!hookup!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!nagle
From: nagle@netcom.com (John Nagle)
Subject: Re: The SmalltalkAgents literature package
Message-ID: <nagleCyzF53.674@netcom.com>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
References: <aae589ab0a021004a99e@[192.55.204.252]>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 1994 04:00:38 GMT
Lines: 30

David Buell <dbuell@QKS.COM> writes:
>John et al:
>I'm afraid the general tone of your message completely missed the boat.
>Somehow you came to these conclusions after reading our info package, so
>it's our fault, and I will have to go back and double-check our info pack
>to see where we lead you down the wrong path.

    He also sent me this message as E-mail, but since he posted it as well,
I'm posting my reply:

     Those statements are from the reviews you included in your own
     literature package.

     Re: "supposedly takes an hour to build a standalone app".

	See your literature package, excerpt from MacUser/Europe,
        4 FEB 94, review by Howard Oakley, column 3, paragraph 2.

     Re: "the interpreter has to be installed on the target machine".

	See your literature package, excerpt from FrameWorks, Jan/Feb 1993,
        page 8, column 2, paragraph 3, lines 10 to end: "To run that app, 
        though, still requires that the user have the SmallTalk Agents 
        kernel running on their machine".

This is what QKS mails out when one asks for info.

					John Nagle


