Newsgroups: sci.lang
From: Andre@shappski.demon.co.uk (Andre Shapps)
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!peernews.demon.co.uk!shappski.demon.co.uk!Andre
Subject: Re: Opposite of Diminutive
References: <3ctqg6$q2b@mother.usf.edu> <D0y4I8.1uv@actrix.gen.nz> <gek655.106.000A2AA0@cscgpo.anu.edu.au> <3j2cv4$kf6@nippur.irb.hr> <3j44uh$390@marble.Britain.EU.net>
Organization: Myorganisation
Reply-To: Andre@shappski.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Newswin Alpha 0.7
Lines:  12
X-Posting-Host: shappski.demon.co.uk
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 1995 20:44:08 +0000
Message-ID: <406555617wnr@shappski.demon.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk

In article: <3j44uh$390@marble.Britain.EU.net>  Paul Sampson 
<paul.sampson@octacon.co.uk> writes:
> 
> I believe the insertation of syllabicals should be reservationed
> for more specialisticised meanings of technicaluous terminisms.

Yes, a classicalist examplification of Americanisationism.

-- 
Andre Shapps

