Newsgroups: sci.lang,alt.politics.ec
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news2.harvard.edu!news2.near.net!news.mathworks.com!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.indirect.com!bud.indirect.com!stevemac
From: stevemac@bud.indirect.com (Stefano MacGregor)
Subject: One point against Esperanto
Message-ID: <D4s7G6.Foo@indirect.com>
Sender: usenet@indirect.com (Internet Direct Admin)
X-Konvencioj: c` ... u` 
Organization: Homa Raso
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 1995 21:52:54 GMT
Lines: 12

Lastatempe skribis philip@storcomp.demon.co.uk jene
  [parolante pri supozaj "plibonig`oj" je Esperanto]:
>While they're at it they could also abolish the -n accusative ending,
>and adjective agreement using -j.

  Yes, they =could=, but what would the reason be?  What would be 
=gained= by these losses?

-- 
 --        __0       Stefano MAC:GREGOR      Mi dankas al miaj bons`ancigaj
  --     -`\<,      (s-ro)   \ma-GREG-r\         steloj, ke mi ne estas
   --   (*)/ (*)   Fenikso, Arizono, Usono           superstic`ulo.
